27 November 2011

Scurvy little spider

It's a Wonderful Life

(1946)
Watched this early in the holiday season because I don't yet feel very holiday-ish, and I thought this might help (and after all, the first time I saw it, or most of it, in a couple of televised chunks, was on Thanksgiving Day not quite 30 years ago), and maybe it will turn out to have helped, but for now I'm distracted by the burning question: Where do Eustace and Tilly fit in?

Right, and then that's another whole issue: I'd noticed before that the third man at the building and loan is named Eustace, but I never noticed the name of the woman there until tonight, and that only after spying a desk nameplate reading "Matilda Bailey." So Eustace, Tilly? Coincidence? Probably not, probably a New Yorker joke by hip screenwriters Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. But it provides a nice symmetry to the assumption that Bert the Cop and Ernie the cab driver are the sources of the Sesame Street characters' names.

Anyway, having wondered how the hell Tilly is related to George, I paid close attention to her thereafter and noticed that at least once she addresses Uncle Billy by that name, and at least once as just Billy--not proof that she's his niece, but pretty strong evidence that she's not his child. So, George and Harry's sister? Didn't seem particularly likely, but likelier than that there would be another brother of Peter and Billy who is invisible, especially since you could watch the film a dozen times or more and never realize that Tilly was a Bailey even if you caught that Tilly was Tilly.

So I paid close attention to the end credits, which list not only "Cousin Tilly" but also "Cousin Eustace." So as unlikely as the explanation is, it's apparently right. But how odd that the characters would be related but overlookably so, via someone of whose existence no other evidence survives.

26 November 2011

Materials at hand

So-good-to-be-back M5--er, no, 4

Think of me as a footballer, sidelined for 22 months with a bad hamstring tear. Would you expect me to go the full 90 minutes my first time back in the lineup? So I prefer to think of my glass as 4/5 full rather than 1/5 empty; I prefer not to employ the word "abortive." Yet it remains undeniable that I have for the first time I can remember been ejected from a movie theater.

Before that the return-from-long-injury metaphor works pretty well, too: not my best day on the pitch--spent a lot of the day just sort of getting my feet wet or getting my feet planted firmly on the ground or doing whatever else clichéd thing with my feet that you can think of. Started with a perfectly ordinary film, then advanced to one a little more interesting.

But that footballer, if he (or she!) is a good one, whose return was worth waiting out the 22 months' absence, will show one flash of brilliance in his (or her!) 75 minutes, and so this M4-not-5 showed one flash of brilliance.

In all, a good if not profoundly wonderful day at the movies.

Being Elmo: A Puppeteer's Journey

IFC
Didn't really set out to go heavy on the documentaries, it just worked out this way. But I have to say, I really don't get the fuss over this one. OK, yeah, moderately interesting story of a nice guy who fell in love with puppets watching Sesame Street and Captain Kangaroo, cut up his father's fur-lined coat to make his own first puppet, and went on to voice the most annoying muppet ever, but it was more like something I'd have ungrudgingly have devoted 15 minutes worth of New York Times Magazine reading to. I fail to see what's special enough about the guy's story to earn 76 minutes of my Manhattan movie day. We do get a little about how his Elmo obsession cost him a wife and endangered his relationship with his daughter, and if the filmmakers had had the guts to go darker, that might have been an interesting story. Might have been.

Garbo: El espía (Garbo: The spy)

Quad
I guess if I knew my World War II history better, I'd be familiar with the Catalonian spy whose campaign of disinformation was largely responsible for the German leadership's belief that the Allied landing in Normandy was merely a feint to draw attention away from the main invasion in Pas de Calais. That is a great story, and a critical event that helped ensure that the war would not drag on for another several years.

But the incredible part of Juan/Joan Pujols García's espionage career came earlier, when, his offer of service rebuffed repeatedly by British intelligence, he set himself up in Lisbon and fed the German's fiction after fiction--all based on the bigger fiction that he was transmitting his intelligence from London. This was something like 18 months of reporting on a city he'd never seen, and getting away with it. Wtf?

Rid of Me

CV
Filmmakers have gotten a lot of mileage out of starting in medias res (OK, Paul?) and in extremis, then taking us back to a time of calm that seems to have little to do with what we've seen, showing us how we got from A to Q, and taking us past it. Writer/director James Westby works it brilliantly here, as we start with a very bad girl we don't yet know to be Meris making a stunningly aggressive gesture of contempt toward a plain-vanilla blonde who crosses her path at the supermarket.

Cut to a conventional Meris conventionally in love with a conventionally hunky husband, relocating with him, after he has suffered an entrepreneurial disaster, back in his Oregon hometown, where he has a support system of assholes who not only decline to welcome the new wife into the clique but actively campaign for reignition of an old flame.

The "how we get there" is as sane and logical as the "there" is dangerous and over the top, and the accessory bad girl who leads Meris to badness is the sort of character who makes me want to put the film on pause and call my daughter immediately to tell her that even though this will never come to Champaign, she needs to do whatever is necessary to see it. And that's why I make Manhattan movie trips!

Urbanized

IFC
I take back my vote in the recent mayoral election; I want New Haven's mayor to be that guy from Bogotá who talks about the lack, in any constitution he knows of, of the right to park your car. There's nothing surprising or revolutionary here--well, unless of course all the good ideas about city planning we've been hearing now for a couple of decades were actually implemented--now that would be revolution to believe in. But it's still a smart bit of preaching to the choir--easily the best of the 3 documentaries I saw on the day.

Trailers
Oh, but wait: you're still waiting to hear about my ejection, aren't you--my cinematic red card, as it were. Well, this is a fair place to explain, because it was about trailers and the other ancillary crap that IFC habitually shows before its features. You might ask what made me think that I could get from a 6:05 film with a running time of 83 minutes to a 7:45 one, even if the theater doors were literally two steps distant, but here's the thing: I might not have made that assumption and bought both tickets at once but for a bizarre phenomenon that governed my first 3 films, including the opener at IFC. Before Urbanized I had not seen a single trailer! Fluke or new downtown policy, it seemed to suggest that I could safely assume no more than 17 minutes of preliminaries and comfortably slide next door to Into the Abyss, Werner Herzog's death penalty documentary, in time to find a seat.

But in the event, the end titles of Urbanized started rolling at 7:48, and even violating my stay-to-the-end policy, I found the next-door theater packed: the guy why went in ahead of me got one of the 3 empty seats, a second was covered with plastic to indicate brokenness or other condition of inutility, and that left me the seat by the wall in the second row, meaning that in order to reach a location that would result in a stiff neck after 108 minutes (well, plus all the preliminary crap, only 3 minutes of which I'd missed) I was going to have to negotiate (gimpy ankled) a row of maybe 16 backpacks and winter coats (because even though it was 60 much of the day, people do wear winter coats to the movie theater--the fuck's up with that?).

Screw that, I said, and instead I sat on an aisle step most of the way back toward the projection room, squeezing tight against the wall to minimize fire-exit obstruction, but pretty much knowing that someone would come along soon to tell me I had to take either the ostensibly available seat or a refund. Well, I thought, Herzog's documentaries have a pretty fair recent history of making it to New Haven, and I'm really not much into watching under these condition, and moreover, I have to admit, I'm exhausted. So when The Man came, I took the 13 bucks and the F train.

By the way, when I finally did start to see trailers, the first was one I'd already seen at the Criterion, for Pina, and the second was for some old seasonal Capra chestnut starring Jimmy Stewart. But then finally:
  • Tonari no Totoro (My neighbor Totoro)--Took me a while to figure out whether this is one of the Studio Ghibli films I've seen; looks enchanting, in the stoned anime way (oh, and also looks very indebted to Lewis Carroll).
  • Ma part du gâteau (My piece of the pie)--Another kill-the-capitalists comedy; sure, why not?
  • Sleeping Beauty--I've been wondering about whether this is just going to be too creepy to face, but unfortunately I was too distracted by my impending ejection to pay close attention. Pretty creepy, though.

25 November 2011

Like clockwork

Hugo

Crit
If the film hadn't put me in such a generous mood, I might ask, with genuine annoyance, why all these Parisians speak with English accents. But it did, so I'm not. A magical love story (and love of books as well as movies--is this made for me or what?) that would have misted me up more only if it had been my Xmas Day movie rather than my day-after-Thanksgiving one.
Trailer

24 November 2011

As I lay dying

The Descendants

Crit
More than once I've said (approvingly) of Alexander Payne that he doesn't really much like people. I never meant it completely without irony, but it was a plausible shorthand until now. This film comes scarily close to being plausibly described as heartwarming--but wait, I mean that in a good way. Here Payne once and finally makes it clear that, as the nuns exhorted us to do in grade school, he hates the sin but loves the sinners. Almost  every prick or doofus in the film gets a redemptive moment--wins a redemptive moment, earns it. Without, of course, essentially changing. "Yes, people are awful," the film seems to admit, "and yet . . . " A fair cop.

About actors: Is there anyone besides Clooney who could better portray a guy who is still trying to recover from a shot to the solar plexus when he gets kicked in the balls as well? And has anyone since Brando as effectively stolen a scene with a dead (OK, comatose, but you tell me the difference, thespianwise) woman? OK, well, maybe Judy Greer, here (and seriously, isn't it about time for us to see her in something for more than 5 minutes?)? And the kids (Shailene Woodley, Amara Miller, and Nick Krause)? Yes, ever so.
Trailers

20 November 2011

These precious days

Radio Days

(1987)
A really odd film, pointedly limited in its appeal but dedicated to the titular era, and blessedly so. It's never going to be anyone's favorite Woody Allen film, but the participation of some of his repertory company in minor roles--a small part for Mia Farrow, tiny ones for Jeff Daniels, Tony Roberts, and (vocalist for one Cole Porter song) Diane Keaton--suggests how much more heart mattered than head.

And (and  tall cotton, this): maybe the best soundtrack of any Allen film.

120 degrees of separation

Like Crazy

Crit
OK, this game is hard to play every time out: I guess what this has in common with the last film I watched is a long, arduous march to futility.

Not by chance, I think, that Jacob (Anton Yelchin) and Anna (Felicity Jones) meet in LA rather than New York--part of the point of her having to return to London (having crucially but believably overstayed her student visa) is, I think, that they're a third of the world, a third of the day, a third of their lives apart, and love is no match for that global mass. We care because this does as good a job as any film I've seen lately of showing young love in all its foolishness and beauty and bittersweetness in a way that resonates even with an old codger. And the telegraphic narrative--a montage of the couple in bed, in different positions and nightclothes, covers the passage of months, and some time jumps occur even more abruptly--which would be confusing and annoying in a lot of films, here perfectly conveys those lost transitions between desperation and fatigue. A lovely, heartbreaking film.
Trailer

19 November 2011

Occupate Via Appia

Spartacus

(1960)
Let's play What Does This Film Have in Common with the Last Film I Watched? Hell, I don't know--something about keeping a private world intact while the public world is going to hell? For me, this is about blacklisted screenwriter Dalton Trumbo finally getting a screen credit and depicting men not naming names--or, rather, claiming rather than naming names. The scene that everyone remembers is less than a minute long, but if it doesn't move you, you're immovable.

Loomings

Melancholia

Crit
Let's play What Does This Film Have in Common with the Last Film I Watched? Hmmm, a poser. I guess I'd say the unsurprising surprise discovery of a corpse.

So let's say it's Earth's last day before colliding with a much larger planet that will smoosh us all like bugs. Would you fix pancakes for breakfast? Would you want to spend your last minutes drinking wine and singing the Ode to Joy on the terrace? These are a couple of the least-provocative questions (hell, we haven't even talked about the toxic wedding reception) from provocateur supreme Lars, who, bless his sweet loopiness, never bores us, even when he decides to test-drive his inner Bruckheimer.

18 November 2011

Nothing more foolish than a man chasing his hat

Miller's Crossing

(1990)
Let's play What Does This Film Have in Common with the Last Film I Watched? The song "Runnin' Wild," though here the vocalist is a man, and we don't see him (so maybe he does look like Marilyn, but I'm guessing not), and he doesn't seem to be playing a ukulele.

Not sure why we didn't see this when it was in theaters; not sure why I didn't much care for it when we saw it a few years later. Not paying close enough attention? I dunno--seems a pretty fair Coen spin on double-cross gangster noir. Maybe I held against it the minuscule role for Frances McDormand--she's onscreen for less than a minute, I'd guess--which is about as long as Gabriel Byrne is off of it.

Anyway, an intended deaccessioning, but I've decided to keep it.

13 November 2011

St. Valentine's Day mascara

Some Like It Hot

(1959)
"There are laws, conventions; it's just not being done!" Joe admonishes Gerry, who has accepted a marriage proposal from the millionaire Osgood Fielding III (Joe E. Brown). Well, yeah, but fewer laws and weaker conventions now, and it is being done in increasing numbers. How cool is that?

One of those films that is always a pleasant surprise--Curtis is as entertaining impersonating Cary Grant as he is in Josephine drag, Lemmon's postproposal intoxication as Daphne is priceless, and Monroe was never more . . . well, just more. And, of course, as has often been pointed out, Brown gets to deliver one of the half-dozen or so greatest last lines in the history of the medium.

12 November 2011

Skin deep

Shi gan (Time)

(2006)
This is what Vertigo would be like, if the obsession were mutual and lots more obsessive. I thought about it a lot in the early image-shaping scenes of the Almodóvar yesterday. It doesn't quite rate the 5 stars I gave it when I first saw it, but it certainly merits its place on my top-ten foreign list for 2007 (U.S. release)--it is, I find, the only one of those 10 I've yet returned to. The atmospherics are remarkable and consistently unsettling, and the erotic sculpture garden (based on one on Jeju Island, I guess, but more sophisticated than the images I can find of that one) is worthy of its own film.

The untouchables

J. Edgar

Crit
I'm not as sure as some that Clint's a genius, but he's certainly a grown-up, so while he doesn't dodge reports of his subject's transvestism and homosexuality, he desensationalizes both, providing a reasonable context for the one incident we see of the first and using the second as the basis for a sad story of love and denial and (it seems clear to me) nonconsummation.

Leo is good, but Armie Hammer (the Winkelvii in The Social Network) steals the show as Hoover's more honest (and thus vulnerable, and thus inevitably abused, and thus heartbreaking in his devotion) partner Clyde Tolson. Sadly, the aging makeup on both looks like crap; only Naomi Watts, as the other person (once his mother [Judi Dench] dies) who loves him, ages well--and apparently a lot less than the boys do in the same number of years.
Trailer

11 November 2011

My favorite obsession

La piel que habito (The skin I live in)

Crit
Ah, Pedro: love him or hate him, you can't deny he takes us places we'd never see via Hollywood. About two-thirds of the way through this, I was simultaneously admiring and being repulsed by it, and I was certain I wouldn't be adding it to my personal Almodóvar shelf. Now I'm not so sure. I was, as well, feeling nostalgic for my comfort level while watching those 2 recent flicks I had praised for putting me so on edge--they seemed pretty relaxed compared with this.

And then came the plot twist that completely blindsided me (partly, I'll confess, because of a lack of vision on my part that some people I know don't share), and then . . . I got lots more uncomfortable, then adjusted, and finally I found the weird world the director had put us into more or less normal, leaving me happy to take whatever came from there.

One gripe: the final scene would have been a lot more effective had the suspension point on which it ends come--as it easily could have--just a few seconds into the scene.
Trailers
  • The Iron Lady--A long teaser rather than a trailer, with an absolutely brilliant wait-for-it, wait-for-it, wait-for-it reveal.
  • OK, seriously, just open Pariah already, so I can stop seeing the damn trailer. I'm pretty sure I'm not a racist and positive I'm not homophobic, but I'm an ironclad bigot against crap high school "poetry"; the film itself might actually be OK, and it's certain to have a lower concentration of that puerile verse.

06 November 2011

North by East Village

Date Night

(2010)
Two brilliant TV comedians gives us about the 23 minutes of a small screen half-hour's worth of entertainment, mostly front-loaded, with some good bits in the end-titles outtakes and a very brief bump from James Franco about 2/3 of the way through. In between, a ponderous Wizard of Oz story, with a huge debt to the film that inspired me to classify all films as Wizard of Oz films or Not-Wizard of Oz films, After Hours. It also steals its potentially fatal misidentification in a tony dining/drinking establishment directly from Hitchcock.

Oh, "HBO?" you're asking; a free sample from DirecTV a while back; this was one of only two films, I believe, that seemed remotely worth recording.

05 November 2011

Now I try to be amused

The Wizard of Oz

(1939)
If you check out the recent YouTube video of choice among Facebook parents and grandparents of small children, you'll understand immediately why I've been thinking of this film. Great bonus of old rockers breeding anew: they get involved with Sesame Street!

So let's have some audience participation: of the many, many logical non-sequiturs and self-evident inaccuracies in this nonetheless nearly perfect film, what is your favorite? This is mine:
Dorothy: You know, we were just wondering why you couldn't come with us to the Emerald City to ask the Wizard of Oz for a heart.
Tin Man: Well, suppose the Wizard wouldn't give me one when we got there?
Dorothy: Oh, but he will! He must! We've come such a long way already.
Apart from this embodying a bizarrely naïve logic that suggests that deserts are invariably rewarded in kind, it shows a huge leap in optimism since Dot's answer to the Scarecrow's parallel question:
Scarecrow: Do you think if I went with you this Wizard would give me some brains?
Dorothy: I couldn't say. But even if he didn't you'd be no worse off than you are now.
Yes, that's good down-to-earth Kansas farmgirl logic there; clearly by the next scene so much Technicolor has leaked into her brain that she has lost touch with her roots.

Helter skelter

Martha Marcy May Marlene

Crit
OK, first time I was ever aware of John Hawkes was in the trailer for Me and You and Everyone We Know, which I saw several times before the film came to town, and I thought he was a dead ringer for a young Dennis Hopper, so though his character looked like a sweet guy in the trailer, I wouldn't have been surprised to have him turn out to be a rapist leader of a murderous cult.

But his character was in fact a sweet guy in the film, and not long after that, he became for me what he will always be: the lovable and reliable best friend Sol Star in Deadwood, and since then I've not wanted to have to not like his character--he can have a few rough edges, as in Wristcutters: A Love Story or Winter's Bone, but I'm no longer prepared for him to be Charlie Manson. Guess I have to get past that.

Remember (gosh, I hope so--it was only a week ago!) what I said about Take Shelter, that it was "the front-runner in the 'I-was-never-comfortable' sweepstakes for 2011"? Well, it still is, but this is a worthy runner-up. And the films are alike in a surprising number of ways: in each, the protagonist behaves in ways that seem bizarre to those who haven't seen what (s)he has seen; in each, the protagonist foresees a catastrophe that no one else can sense; and each film ends on a big question mark: is that catastrophe imminent? Show 'em as a double feature and sell Ambien at the concession stand!

04 November 2011

Too much

Edmond

(2005)
"Controversial one-act play by Mamet" was the clue for 56-across in the Times crossword today, which I took as a sign that the film version should be my Friday-night deaccesion. Which is appropriate, because Edmond (the charming William H. Macy, in what must be the most repulsive role of his career) is looking for signs everywhere, in his appointment time at the office next Monday, in the tarot cards turned by a storefront seer, in the hat (identical to one his mother wore) on the head of a subway rider. And which is also appropriate because it's good to have this poisonous, hateful film about a stupid racist, misogynist lunatic off of my hard drive, which it must have been polluting for almost 2 years.

How stupid? He expects a hooker to take a credit card; he expects a private dancer to remove the plexiglass partition; he expects to beat the 3-card monte dealer; he expects a waitress who looks like Julia Stiles to take him home. Actually, implausibly, that last comes true, though it turns out not to be the wisest decision for either of them. After which Edmond continues to wander a New York pre-Giulianian in its sleaze but 21st-century enough to offer free phones from its storefronts--in short, the ugliest of all Apples, one that makes you long for the Travis Bickle version.

I'll never tell whether he gets his comeuppance, but I will say that I didn't much care one way or the other.