30 March 2008

They're both completely nuts

The Talk of the Town

(1942)

I kept thinking throughout this, "If only Frank Capra had directed this, it would have been spectacular instead of only very good."

OK, problem: do you believe Cary Grant as a Bolshevik on trial for capital arson? No, me neither. John Garfield might have been better casting--though then we'd have lost the fun of having Cary play against Jean Arthur, who is perfectly cast, but again, in need of Capra.

Just a bunch of out-of-control primates

Wheeee! A cinematic adventure. Pull up a chair. It started Wednesday, with my weekly online check on the local openings. Hell, aka the megaplex at the Connecticut Post Mall, had, in addition to the opening-everywhere stuff like 21 and Superhero Movie, one distinctly unmegaplex listing: a single Sunday 10:30 a.m. screening of Sharkwater, a documentary busting on DVD Tuesday and high in my Netflix queue. Frankly, this looked more like the occasional listings error than fulfillment of my wish for one of the Greater New Haven Showcases to pick up the art-house slack left by the closing of Showcase Orange. Still, since Hell was also showing Stop-Loss--and North Haven was not, suggesting at least a little programming distinction between the two remaining 'burbplexes--the double-feature potential was appealing, and since the end is near but not eminent for the book I'm reading (you can go see me at Goodreads if you want more on that), worst-case scenario was sitting in Hell trying to block out the noise for the 90 minutes I'd planned to be watching feature 1.

This a.m. I dialed the theater's automated schedule--and it did not list Sharkwater. OK, odds on "listings error" improve. I have lots to do before my daughter and granddaughter come to visit this week, so I briefly considered putting S-L on hold and getting some things done at home. Briefly. In the event (duh) I walked downtown to catch the 9:30 bus. This is where the story begins to get magical. The bus stops, people get on, then the guy in front of me is, it seems, holding things up. Finally the driver waves the guy on but stops me from dipping my 10-pass and waves me on too, because the fare box is on the fritz.

I sit and read, and the bus sits--is he waiting for someone to come fix the box? I have some time to spare, but only about 20 minutes. Let's go, dude! After a few minutes, he beckons me forward and asks me to fill out a card w/ my contact info. OK, fair enough: I'm happy to pay for my ride later if I can't pay for it now, but let's go (I don't say). Driver gets busy w/ a bunch of other riders (including one who swipes my seat), so I hand off the card and pen to another CT Transit person standing there, find another seat, return to reading about Dr. King's final months.

Driver beckons me again. Dude, what more do you want from me? I'd love to fix the fare box, but . . . he's holding out another 10-pass to me, albeit one with only 6 rides left on it. I look at him quizzically, but before I can think of anything to say, he says, "Take it," and goes on to apologize for the inconvenience. I have no idea why. I saw no indication of anyone else getting such a payoff. Was it the Righteous Babe hooded sweat shirt? The king bio wasn't wearing its jacket, so that doesn't seem a likely answer. Middle-aged white-guy privileges? Dunno, but I rode free and got a bonus of 6 more rides.

Though he does barely get me there in time to race through Hell (the bus stops on the far end of Hell from the megaplex), pop my credit card in the machine (I avoid human contact when I can), buy my S-L ticket and my popcorn-and-Diet Pepsi-lunch voucher, and discover that Sharkwater doesn't show up on this menu any more than it did on the phone. Damn!

Still, I figure I'll go to the ticket counter and see whether I can get an explanation. The rolling marquee is showing no sign of the flick when I approach, and the ticket seller asks, "How can I help you?" "Apparently you can't," I say, and start to explain why I'm there so early when the marquee rolls over and there it is: Sharkwater, PG, 10:30. "There it is!" I say, because, well, wouldn't you? and I ask for one ticket, meanwhile pulling out my money clip, which is actually a money rubber band. And then more magic: "It's a free show," she says. OK, so I've ridden the bus for minus seven and a half bucks, and now I'm going into my first movie for free. Is this a great fucking country or what?

Sharkwater

(2006)

Post
There wasn't a whole lot here that I didn't at least know the general outlines of--that humans eat about a zillion sharks for every human eaten by a shark, that the Jaws reputation of the Great White (and, by extension, all sharks) is nonsense, that (OK, I hadn't encountered this stat before) the five humans killed annually by sharks is fewer than the number killed by soda machines (for god's sake, if it takes your money, just walk away quietly--they can smell fear!!!)--but this is what movies are good at: making the merely known felt, reinforcing the knowing and the feeling with gorgeous imagery (the shots of schooling hammerheads alone was worth more than the $7.75 I'd been planning to pay), and getting your dander up.

The vast majority of sharks we kill fall prey to one of two phenomena: (1) long-line fishing, which catches indiscriminately and kills awkwardly nontargeted fish, and (2) the (pardon my ethnocentrism, but please!) moronic Chinese notion that shark fin, a product that adds no flavor but only a little texture to soup flavored by chicken or pork, is a fucking delicacy, and must must must be served to guests who must be impressed by your respect for them. So sharks are hauled onto boats, their fins are hacked off, and their carcasses are dumped back into the ocean--which is bad enough if the shark has had the good fortune to die during the ordeal, and much worse if it is still alive but bereft of its means of locomotion and navigation.

Long-line fishing is internationally illegal, I believe, and shark-finning is illegal in most of the coastal waters where sharks can still be found to fin, but that's irrelevant, of course, because we are a race of assholes--a principle articulated much more effectively (see post title) by Paul Watson, the hero of the film, whom I'd met a few months back in an excellent New Yorker piece. Or, rather, Watson would be the hero of the film, if filmmaker Rob Stewart weren't so determined to fill that role himself.

I could have done without Stewart's smugness and his narcissism--hey, don't I look swell swimming nearly naked with the sharks? Let's see that fat toad Michael Moore do this! But merely being somebody I wouldn't care to hang out with doesn't stop the dude from being right, and from making an important film. Oh, I also could have done without his imperfect command of syntax, as in a graphic at the end that tells us, solemnly, "While watching this film, more than 15,000 sharks have been killed." At least I hope it's a syntax problem--if it's not a dangling participle, it's evidence of a tragic, horribly perverse bait-and-fin scam, and it raises the question of how the sharks got to the movie theater in the first place, and how they bought their tickets without opposable thumbs.

Stop-Loss

Damn, I wanted to like Kimberly Peirce's first picture since Boys Don't Cry. But this is how by the numbers it is: I'm not even concerned about a "spoiler" when I say that, about three-fourths of the way through the film, when an important-but-secondary character walks out of the scene, there might as well have been a flashing arrow on the screen, with the text "ABOUT TO KILL HIMSELF."

OK, this may be the worst war we've ever been involved in (which is tall cotton, as my token southerner friend says), and the de facto draft policy that stop-loss represents is one of the most hideous aspects (more tall cotton) of the disastrous "policy" directing this war, but you still need to give us characters to give a shit about. Ryan Phillippe and Abbie Cornish do the best they can, and Victor Rasuk plays one extraordinary sequence as a soldier trying to maintain his naturally optimistic outlook despite the war's having robbed him of an arm, a leg, and his eyes, but finally, the film is like shooting sharks in a barrel.

Trailers

29 March 2008

I don't want to cause trouble; I just want another drink

All About Eve

(1950)

Had to watch this because Terrence Rafferty told me this morning that Bette Davis's 100th birthday was coming up--next Saturday, so you still have time to get a card. It's a strange flick, too long, overwritten and overacted, simultaneously too big and too claustrophobic, which is another way of saying far too stagy, and yet . . .

Gained a new appreciation this time around for Marilyn Monroe's tiny role. She has about six lines, but she delivers each of them perfectly. More to the point, in the middle of about twenty bit roles before getting star billing, here she is given an opportunity to play off of the image of the sexpot with no talent and only as much ambition as others urge her to have. Would have been nice to see her get more shots at irony.

Say you don't need no diamond rings

Hors de prix (Priceless) (2006)

and

Run Fatboy Run

Crit

Let's bracket these as perfectly harmless, mostly enjoyable, ultimately unsurprising popcorn entertainments--not that there's anything wrong with that! The French pic gets the edge, and not just because of that dress Audrey Tautou almost wears in the opening sequence; Prix at least surprises us a bit en route to the unsurprising conclusion, and, being French, has a little genuine cynicism going for it: gold digger, instead of immediately falling in love with the guy who loves her, first teaches him how to dig gold himself. It also reminds my why I liked Le Fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain less than the similarly themed, vastly less promoted film that showed in the U.S. about the same time, Le Battement d'aile du papillon (Happenstance): Tautou's characters are a lot more interesting when they have a bit of the garçonne in them. Gad Elmaleh plays a marginally less hopeless version of the doofus he played so well in the surprising La Doublure (The valet); throw Daniel Auteuil and Kristin Scott Thomas into the mix and this would probably be as good as that.

Comparisons with other Simon Pegg flicks are likewise hard to avoid with Fatboy: not as disappointing as Shaun of the Dead, not as hilarious as Hot Fuzz. The Times review credits it with the potential to "inspire the depressed and the demoralized to grit their teeth and keep running." Doubtful, but I may have to withdraw my "harmless," 'cause it occurs to me that it might inspire the depressed and the demoralized to imagine that they too may find their Thandie Newtons, which will probably only lead to further depression and demoralization in the end.

P.S.--The hell's wrong with people? I was the only one in the audience who stayed for the cover of Toots and the Maytals' "Monkey Man" over the end credits. Turned out to be Amy Winehouse--not as good as the original, but that's a high bar; certainly worth 3 minutes of even my rapidly depleting time left on the planet. Don't bitch about ticket prices if you're not staying for the whole show, eh?

Trailers

  • Sex and the City: The Movie--Had seen a teaser, but saw the full trailer for the first time today: she marries Big! Yes, yes, I've Netflixed the whole series over time--a good palate cleanser after an intense season of Deadwood or The Shield. I'm noncommittal about the film.
  • Snow Angels--Already opened in the city, and reviewed at the level where I'll see it downtown but skip it in the 'burbs.
  • Монгол (Mongol)--Holy hordes! I could do without Voiceover Guy telling me what a Big Picture this is, but jeez, what a Big Picture this appears to be. Bring it on, Genghis!

28 March 2008

Straight down the line

Double Indemnity

(1944)

Now there's a dame to murder for. Can I just confess that I wasted my youth thinking that Barbara Stanwyck was just a thoroughly unappealing ranch matriarch on TV? Consider that another black mark on the ledger of the U.S. educational system. She's now a hundred years old and dead, and she's still hotter than Rachel McAdams.

I guess this film is generally considered a phone-in job by Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler, and yeah, I guess I can see that the plotting is a little creaky in spots, and that, in theory at least, it depends a little two heavily on the dying-guy-confessing-into-the-Dictaphone frame, but good lord, the dialogue; and good lord, Edward G. Robinson and his "little man" that tells him when a claim is fishy; and good lord, the helplessness of a schlub like Fred MacMurray's Walter Neff in the face and ankle and everything in between of Phyllis Dietrichson. Maybe less than great, but it'll do.

Indigestible

Married Life

Crit

How do I not believe this movie? Let me count the ways:

  1. I don't believe that any sensible heterosexual man could ever prefer Rachel McAdams to My Future Wife Patricia Clarkson, particularly Rachel McAdams in that awful ultrablond hair, particularly not when we're told early on that Clarkson's conveniently named Pat is interested in lots and lots and lots of marital sex.
  2. I don't believe that any character played by Pierce Brosnan in any film would ever ask for "whiskey" rather than for Scotch or Irish or even bourbon, this one being set in America (though not, I gather from the title, the novel on which it's based, Five Roundabouts to Heaven).
  3. I don't believe that any character played by Pierce Brosnan in any film would ever turn down an offered whiskey.
  4. I don't believe in a world that holds two noncretinous women who would fall in love with the thoroughly unattractive character played by Chris Cooper.
  5. I don't believe that someone as good as Cooper (or, for that matter, Clarkson or Brosnan) couldn't find some better use of his time and talent; there are a thousand actors in Hollywood who could have done this just as unbelievably.
  6. But mostly I don't believe in any human psychology that could accept the logic "I must kill my wife to spare her the pain she'd suffer if I left her." I don't know: maybe the Coens could get away with such an absurdity by creating an absurd universe we could believe in for 100 minutes, but it doesn't come close to working here. I mean, we've all wanted to kill a partner (haven't we? hey, come on, don't leave me hanging here . . . ), but only after we've begun to hate him or her; none of us has ever contemplated killing a partner we still actually like (have we? . . . ).

On the other hand, give the setbuilders in British Columbia credit for great interior shots of the Cloud Room and the lobby of the Chrysler Building: there is virtually nothing else in the film that says "New York"--they apparently couldn't afford enough 1949 cars for a street scene, and even the Cooper character's high-floor office has only a generic city view--but they busted their ass on the Chrysler interiors, including the elevators and elevator doors.

Trailers

  • Then She Found Me--Not counting a few episodes of Mad About You, Helen Hunt's writing, producing, and directing debut. I've always liked Helen Hunt, sometimes in spite of herself, so I wish her well, but the trailer looked very much from the Nora playbook.

  • Son of Rambow--First saw the trailer for this last Saturday at the Angelika, but in writing down titles in a notebook in the dark, I overwrite this one. Could be seriously mawkish, but you gotta love the notion of kids making a movie on their own--sort of a lower-budget Be Kind Rewind.

23 March 2008

A soupçon of asparagus

Sideways

(2004)
Drank a 2006 Mark West pinot with this. Mostly Steinbeck, with hints of Hemingway and Fitzgerald and just a soupçon of Faulkner. Doc Debs, you gotta help me w/ this.

Love this baby, even when sober. Payne doesn't like people much, but I don't think that's why all his films work so well for me. It's something about how he doesn't like them. He gently despises them, no? And isn't it about time for something new from him? IMDb shows something called Fork in the Road for 2009, but it's not written by Payne and Taylor, so . . . ?

By the way, in case there's anyone I haven't already mentioned this to, pay attention to the photo we see of young Miles and his late father when Miles is stealing money from his mother's Ajax can in the dresser: it's actually a photo of young Paul Giamatti and his late father, the former Yale president and commissioner of baseball.

Jesus, what a good dog!

Cheung Gong 7 hou (CJ7)

Cine

A perfect Easter Sunday movie, Hong Kong director Stephen Chow's unabashed tribute to his hero Steven Spielberg's film about a Christlike visitor from another planet. But this ET has paws of clay, his Elliot has a bit of an attitude on him, and those of us not blessed with a Chinese frame of mind rarely have the slightest idea where the film is going next. And is it just me, or is the eight-year-old Hong Kong kid who plays Dicky's love interest a dead ringer for Cyndi Lauper?

Not as good as Chow's Shaolin Soccer, but then what is?

22 March 2008

Les mots: de trop

Easter weekend M5

Calcutta

IFC (1969)
A documentary by Louis Malle, currently unavailable on DVD, it seems. You think Calcutta, you think poverty, and indeed we see plenty of what Brecht called der Ärmsten der Armen--those, for example, through whose slum runs a streamlike sewer overburdened by the profane products of other people's sacred cows--but Malle reminds us that suffering does not eliminate quotidian living: the poor wash themselves, they work, they pray, they eat (fed sometimes by Mother Teresa's sisters), they entertain and are entertained. And he casts a much wider net, showing us also the upper-caste Brit wanna-bes watching the horse races in the shadow of the enormous Queen Victoria monument of chasing golf balls through a course sliced out of a slum. There is scarcely any narration (Malle himself provides it), and what there is seems calculated to maintain objectivity and avoid polemic--until the very last line, where, as if unable to shut off his soul anymore, he marvels that poor, dark-skinned immigrants from another region marvel not that they are shunned even by lepers but that anyone would point a camera at them and that their condition would inspire outrage. And then, as if Malle had made a deal with himself to stop filming as soon as he started preaching, FIN.

Le Mépris (Contempt)

FF (1963)
What a cast! There's Jack Palance, there's Fritz Lang, there's Brigitte Bardot, there's Brigitte Bardot's ass! This is Godard at his best, which is to say the intriguing:maddening ratio is at least 2:1. How can adoration turn to contempt in less than 24 hours? I hope you're not really looking for any answers, but contemplation of the question is mostly fascinating, and when it's not, well, the director is gracious enough to bring back Ms. B's derrière sublime every 15 minutes or so. Also views of the Golfo di Napoli from Capri, almost as breathtaking.
Aside from the visuals, the most fun--certainly the most surprising fun--comes from Lang, who is brilliantly cast as a multilingual German film director named Fritz Lang. He immerses himself in the role and nails it, with a lovely little shrug that almost constitutes a fifth language. Palance, encouraged to overact shamelessly, is delightfully awful, and did I mention . . . oh, wait, yes, never mind, I did.

Paranoid Park

Ang
Not sure what I was expecting from Gus Van Sant's latest, but I sure didn't think the word poetry would be coming to mind so often: visual poetry, especially in the many skateboard scenes (going through the head of the unathletic old fart: how the hell do they keep from constantly crashing into each other while hopping from concrete mesa to mesa?), aural poetry in a soundtrack and score as adept at depriving us of our balance as the boardboys are at keeping theirs, veering from Nino Rota to Cast King's "Outlaw" to Ludwig Van's Ninth (and no, neither of the ultrafamous bits).
Gabe Nevins, like almost everyone in the cast a nonprofessional actor 'til now, is perfect as the innocent betrayed by one seemed-like-a-good-idea-at-the-time moment. Kid can act, and the kid's got a face.

Irrelevant postscript: what '70s master of campy piano pop does Van Sant put you in mind of these days?

Les Chansons d'amour (Love songs)

IFC (2007)
You know how you overhear people chatting in a language you don't know, or don't know well, and it always sound like they must be soaring at a level of wit of which you and your friends can only dream? And how, if you somehow find out what they're saying, you realize that they're just as dumb as you and all your dumb friends? Well, that's sort of how this musical of sexual fluidity works. But even with subtitles to tell you how pedestrian the lyrics are, and with your ear telling you how unexceptional the music is, the people are so damned good looking, and they are talking and singing in French, after all, and they're in Paris, fer chrissakes, and so, hell, I don't know, somehow it still works.

Blindsight

IFC (2006)
Remember those kids in Spellbound and how we cheered for them and admired their pluck and really worried about how they were going to do in the big bee? Well, let's say the kids are all blind, and they're all outcasts in the society, and instead of having to spell words in front of ESPN cameras, they've set out to climb Mount Everest. OK, OK, I'm exaggerating: not 29K-foot Everest but merely its 23K-foot neighbor Lhakpa Ri.

Just an astonishing film, with no villains, just some heroes who sometimes have a bit of the asshole about them, chiefly Erik Weihenmayer, the first blind man to scale Everest, and Sabriye Tenberken, co-founder of Braille Without Borders. Not gonna say anymore except absolutely, without fail, see it. Oh, wait, I lied, gotta say one more thing: may surpass Adaptation for best use ever of the Turtles' "Happy Together."

Trailers


21 March 2008

Romani ite domum

Monty Python's Life of Brian

(1979)

Some year I'm going to write a long essay about how this film really isn't blasphemous but is instead a rather conservative historicist treatment of the rise of cults and sects. But not this year, 'cause I have to get to bed early so that I can work out before leaving for tomorrow's M5. And anyway, that's not really why I watch it every Holy Weekend; I watch it because it's a worthy observance for the recovering Catholic. (There is, of course, no such thing as an ex-Catholic.) So good night, and always look on the bright side of life.

Technically, "Whom"

Horton Hears a Who

NoHa

I dunno, maybe I'm just too old, but this didn't seem all that magical to me. Plus, it seemed way too scary for kids young enough to find it magical. But there were a bunch of the little rugrats in the theater, and they seemed to be getting it, so I'll defer to their judgment. For me the best moment was the clear allusion to my favorite line of State and Main: "That happened!" In both films, you had to be there.

The Bank Job

NoHa

You gotta love a film that opens with "Bang a Gong" on the soundtrack. You gotta love a heist film that blends in sex, politics, and Black Power. You gotta love a heist film that ends (SPOILER ALERT!) with the heister hero on his fishing boat with his beautiful wife and beautiful daughters. Anyway, I guess you gotta love it. But I merely liked it.

Trailers


20 March 2008

"Bob was certain that the man had unriddled him"

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

(2007)

Gloriosky, isn't this art! It's so, like, arty, you know? I mean, like, the astigmatic camera, right? That's art, isn't it?

Yeesh: what a confused fucking film. Does it want to debunk myth (Jesse's a right bastard, ripe for assassination) or does it want to reinvigorate it (Jesse has to dust that fucking picture, just like in every other version, turning his back and basically saying, "Judas, dude, do what you're here for." And the portentous voiceover [see above]??? Puh-leeeeeze!)? And somebody tell me why mumbling and nosewiping gets Casey Affleck an Oscar nomination? I mean, I was no huge fan of Gone Baby Gone, but if you held one of those HUGE-fucking-hole-making six-shooters from this flick to my head and said "You must nominate Casey Affleck for an Oscar or we'll make a HUGE fucking hole in your head," I'd have gone with his performance in that before this.

And don't even get me started on the obscene wastes of Mary-Louise Parker and Zooey Deschanel; M-L: I'll write a script for you, with, like, actual dialogue; Z: let's talk about my musical, with a half-dozen show-stoppers for the female lead. Seriously, have your people call my people.

16 March 2008

First commandment: Don't be an asshole

For the Bible Tells Me So

2007
Hey, guess what? Apparently the Bible doesn't oblige us to kill, maim, bash, torture, legislate against, picket, ostracize, or even pray for the cure or people who love not wisely and maybe not always even too well, but just differently from us.

First thought: well, fucking duuuuuhhhhhhh!

Second thought: who gives a flying fiddler's fuck what the Bible says about it, anyway? Yeah, OK, I understand a lot of people do, even a lot of people who aren't necessarily cretins in other respects, but come on: with the arguable exception of the decalogue, none of that shit was writ by the finger of God Him- (or Her-) self, right? It was at best inspired by God but transcribed by people, right? And fer chrissake, people are nothing but Soylent Green fodder, right? So why the fuck would we trust that transcription?

Think, people! Just fucking think.

George and Martha on a bad night

Funny Games

Crit
An interview:

Cheese: I understand you considered giving this one a pass.

Blab: Yes, everything about it just seemed so repellent. Then when both Lane and Scott essentially said, "What's the point? Haneke already did this once!" I thought about just Netflixing the original, so at least I could stop it and go wash my hands if I got to feeling really dirty. Or at least fix another drink.

C: So?

B: Two things: it was downtown, where the bar is lower, and I don't skip things 'cause I expect 'em to make me uncomfortable; I skip things 'cause I expect 'em to be stupid. Haneke had given me every reason to believe, with The Piano Teacher and Caché, that he's capable of making me squirm but no reason to believe he's stupid. So.

C: And?

B: Well, I don't wish I hadn't gone, exactly--I wasn't ever tempted to walk out, as the woman a few rows behind me did about a half-hour in--but renting the original might indeed have been a better solution. This might be one of those times when it would pay to be watching unfamiliar faces speaking an unfamiliar language that you have to decode by reading titles rather than hearing English plainly spoken by actors with countless associations. To take the readiest example, when Tim Roth is wheezing in pain, it's hard not to think of Mr. Orange lying on the floor in Reservoir Dogs, and once your mind goes there, it's impossible not to compare tortures there and here. To the extent that this film is going to work at all, I think you need as much distance from the familiar as you can muster.

C: And what constitutes its "working"?

B: The two reviews I've read (well, read one, glanced at beginning and end of the other--I rarely read a full Times review for fear of spoilers, and because I can get from the lead and the close all I need to help me decide) agree that Haneke is trying to work a sort of anti-Saw (no link for that: I don't want to seem to be encouraging its consumption), to comment on sangoporn. I wouldn't disagree with that, but I think in fact something far more interesting is going on here: call it victoporn. In slasher movies, I guess we're supposed to be somehow implicated into rooting for the perpetrator; in FG, that doesn't happen: we identify with the victims, but we still want them victimized.

C: Sick, dude.

B: I know, right? But let me say a few more words about the demographics of the "crowd" (six of us at the start, attritting to five). There was the couple behind me, that became the guy behind me, and then there were either youngish grandparents or oldish parents of a boy about twelve. I actually considered asking whether they had any idea what they were getting into, but the myob gene won out over the my-father-Sam gene. And they stayed to the end. Hell, I don't know: maybe the kid's mature enough to deal with this shit; maybe he won't have nightmares. Which may put him one up on me.

Trailer

  • Redbelt--A trailer that from beginning to end screams "not your kind of film" except for two words: David and Mamet. Gee, that's a bareknuckled gladiatorfest of a different color.

15 March 2008

Two little Hitlers

The Great Dictator

(1940)
OK, let's cuts CC some slack: when he made the film, some of his countrymen and some of mine were still kissing Aryan ass; it's a film that had to be made.

That said . . . it's just really not very damned good. A few comic bits work: the famous globe-balloon ballet and the Brahms shave that follows, for example, and the coin-in-the-pudding bit, but most of the comedy falls flat (all the Napaloni stuff is just annoying ethnic shtick, e.g.--being on the right side doesn't excuse it and sure as hell doesn't make it funny), and with the exception of a line or two of the climactic radio address, all the serious stuff is just molasses. Yes, yes, I know: but good politics doesn't redeem bad art, no matter how good the politics is.

Just a little piece of paper coated with chlorophyll

Die Fälscher (The counterfeiters)

Crit (2007)

The 2007 Best Foreign Language Film Oscar winner, but by my rules (date of U.S. theatrical release) the first contender for 2008 honors. And I gotta say, the critics who suggested that nothing the manifestly incompetent nominating committee nominated was remotely as good as, say, 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days was unfair to this. Like that film, this one takes a subject everyone has strong feelings about--one that many of us have kneejerk feelings about--and introduces ambiguity that we're really uncomfortable with. And I'm always a fan of discomfort. Perhaps those Foreign Film bozos aren't quite as bozo-ish as I've been assuming.

Oh, but how about this for a paying-attention-to-end-credits bonus: Sally's paramour in the frame story is played by one Dolores Chaplin, granddaughter of Charles and Oona, thus great-granddaughter of Eugene O'Neill. And so I decided that my evening viewing should also be Holocaust-and-Chaplin-related.

Trailers

  • Stop Loss--Second time I've seen this trailer and I can't decide whether I expect it to be harrowing or merely harridenish.
  • Hors de prix (Priceless)--Oh boy! Amélie as a ho'! Most unpromising tagline of the year? You be the judge: "She dated only men with money until she met a man with a heart."



09 March 2008

The things we do for love

Après la vie (After life)

(2002)

According to my daughter, who should know, the wisest observation I ever made is that it's impossible ever to know what goes on inside a relationship you're not part of. (Hard enough knowing what's up with one you are part of, but that's another story.) That is the moral of the dramatic third of Lucas Belvaux's trilogy. If we've watched the other two films, Cavale and Un Couple épantant, ahead of this one, as I did this time around, you think you know all about the loveless marriage of morphine addict Agnès and corrupt cop Pascal, but you've been looking from the outside, and getting less than half the story. From inside the relationship, it's a very different story, a much more complex story, a much harder and more satisfying story.

As I've mentioned, Belvaux says that the trilogy is not meant to be viewed in any particular order, that he wants people to see it in every arrangement. That's as may be, but the European release order, which is what I followed this time, seems designed to peel the layers of the onion most effectively. Then again, when I watch in a different order next time, maybe I'll feel that's the perfect order. In any case, a remarkably successful narrative experiment: two excellent films, and one rather silly one that nonetheless makes its contribution to the whole.

The sea in our ears

Bikur Ha-Tizmoret (The band's visit)

Crit (2007)

Rumor has it that this would have been Israel's nomination for the Best Foreign-Language Film Oscar except that it was ineligible because it contains too much English. Given that English is the common language of the traveling Egyptian police orchestra and the small-town Israelis they meet as a result of a travel mixup--and given that it is so heavily accented that the filmmakers felt obliged (mostly unnecessarily) to provide English subtitles for the English--this seems like a rather silly technicality, but then it shouldn't surprise me that the Foreign Film committee can't get anything right.

Not that this is an award-worthy film, but it is sweet and funny and idealistic (if only we could just spend some time with people who are unlike us--though at least it's not naïve enough to have made it a Hamas orchestra, say), and it contains a scene of coached romance worthy of Rostand.

Trailers

08 March 2008

Suspicious minds

Un Couple épatant (An amazing couple)

(2002)
Unlike last night's Cavale, this portion of Lucas Belvaux's multigeneric trilogy cannot stand alone: while minor loose ends may actually enhance the appeal of a noir thriller, in a sex farce (or, rather, sexless farce) like this, questions like why Jeanne has been arrested and who the guy at the chalet is would simply be distractions if you didn't have the other parts to refer to.

As it is, the lightness of this weakest third is nearly unbearable. Alain, of the titular twosome, is about to undergo minor surgery, but he has somehow convinced himself that he has terminal cancer. His attempt to keep the truth from his wife, Cécile, makes her suspect that he's having an affair, and her behavior under that misapprehension makes him suspect . . . oh, you get the picture. It's cute and silly and pleasant, but it's definitely the short side of the triangle. Or at least I hope so: I guess I won't be sure of that until I refresh my memory of Après la vie.

I should mention at some point that the films were positioned in a different order in the United States than in Europe, but Belvaux held that that made no difference, and I'm taking him at his word: the first time I saw them, I saw Après first, then Cavale, and ended with Couple. If I watch them all four more times over the next few years, I'll try out each possible combination.

07 March 2008

Drive, he said

Cavale (On the run)

(2002)

OK, look: I take a back seat to no one in loving The Maltese Falcon and The Big Sleep, but if there's a more perfect film noir than this, I haven't seen it. It has (1) prison escape, (2) sympathetic killer, (3) thwarted love, (4) potential new love, and so on--never mind that it's just one-third of a remarkable coterminous multigeneric trilogy. Good lord, how was I able to buy all three films, on two discs, for $5.98, postage paid? If you can get the same deal, get it! Otherwise, Nf.

All we have are unanswered questions at the start: what was he in for? Why is he out? What does he plan? What alliances and grudges remain? The answers come--not necessarily completely, but satisfactorily--little by maddening little, building both our sympathy for and our frustration with Bruno. The answers will doubtless be refined in the other two films (I'm glad it has been a few years since I saw the whole trilogy in a single M5 day), but this would stand alone if it needed to as a gem of its genre.

One other bit of minor praise: the subtitlers respect us enough to know that they don't need to translate every "bonsoir." On the other hand, I did notice one euphemized translation that I wish had been given straight: at the end of a marital argument, the woman says, according to the titles, "Who cares what you think?" which is a harsh enough thing to say to your ostensible partner in life and love. But I know a little bit of French, enough to recognize that what she really said was "Fuck what you think!" Ouch.

Far from Fargo

Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day

Crit

You know, on Oscar night I was thinking, There's Mrs. Joel Coen, looking so un-movie star, thrilled with her husband and brother-in-law's success; but when's she gonna get back up here on the podium? Well, how 'bout next February? Good god, what a performance, giving ballast to a vehicle with scant substance otherwise--providing, as her character does to those around her, a gravitas much needed in a fluffy story that happens to take place in London on the eve of the Second World War. "They don't remember the first time, do they?" she asks the only other grown-up, played by Ciarán Hinds.

Gotta say, extremely disappointed in Amy Adams, who gave us her own unique spin in Catch Me If You Can, Junebug, Enchanted, and even Charlie Wilson's War--why did she feel compelled here to try to channel Marilyn? Fact is, she's better than Marilyn.

Trailers

New feature:

02 March 2008

Cruciverbal

Wordplay

(2006)
Come on, admit it: you do the New York Times crossword puzzle every day and record your time. Admit it: you spend more time with the Saturday puzzle than with the entire A section. Admit it: your life's ambition is to win the national tournament.

No? Not true? What are you, some kind of freak? You might still enjoy this documentary, which, while it falls short of its obvious model, Spellbound, nonetheless provides a unique portrait of competitive obsession. But you probably won't need to own it, and you probably won't watch it in honor of tournament weekend (in Brooklyn for the second year, after spending its first 29 at the Stamford, Connecticut, Marriott). You'll probably just watch it once, laugh at the oddballs, and forget about it.

The rest of you, though--the normal ones--you know what I'm talking about.

La día de la marmota de América

Vantage Point

Crit
In the neverending contest of Who(m) Do You Trust, Dargis moves up in the standings for saying "you'd be a lot happier staying home with your book," while Denby loses face for saying "worth seeing as long as it's within walking distance and the theater has bargain matinees." But really, was anything more than common sense needed to keep me away: it's an action/suspense film; if it were any damn good, would it be opening in February?

Essentially, what you have here is Groundhog Day, minus the romance, minus the comedy, minus any remotely appealing characters, minus a single line of notable dialogue, and minus any stake in the action to make you give half a shit what happens. Hell, even the chase scene is boring. Ugh.

I was at least going to say that at least Salamanca looks interesting, but after watching the end credits roll I have to say that at least Mexico City looks interesting. (IMDb does list Salamanca as one of the locations--I hope for the Plaza Mayor where the central action takes place. I also see that the film seems likely to finish a close second to Semi-Pro for b.o. #1 this weekend, which just goes to show ya.)

01 March 2008

Shot moon, ate 25

Shoot the Moon

(1981)
I gather the consensus is that this is an underrated gem; herewith my contribution to the underrating. Not Finney's or Keaton's fault: they act their asses off trying to save a story mired in long-term-marriage-gone-stale cliché. Also notable for an astonishing annoying and oft-repeated bit of not-quite-melodic piano noodling.

Fathers and sons

Cidade dos Homens (City of men)

Crit
Conventional, surprise-free storytelling that nonetheless is moving and effective to white middle-class liberals who are suckers for poverty and violence way above the U.S. bar. Winning performances by the two lead actors, also, Douglas Silva and Darlan Cunha, as well as by thug Jonathan Haagensen, seen earlier in Cidade de Deus (City of God). This has me contemplating the Brazilian TV series that is apparently a bridge between the two Cities.