05 January 2008

His left eye

Le Scaphandre et le papillon (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly)


Crit

Maybe a forgotten ticket stub will change my mind (but if it's forgotten, how likely is that?), but for now my Best Picture of 2007 would have to go either to this or to No Country for Old Men, and the two are so completely different that it's going to be tough to pick. This is just a beautiful film, in every way, walking a tightrope over the abyss of sentimentality but rising (like a butterfly?) into empyrean emotion, well earned, painful, and thrilling. Julian Schnabel may insist that he's an artist who merely dabbles in film, but his third dabbling at direction makes it clear that his genius translates. And given the Academy's affection for Afflicted Guy--and also given the fact that it's an absolutely astonishing performance--Mathieu Amalric seems a shoo-in for Oscar.

04 January 2008

Wise up

Magnolia

(1999)

A screening of my favorite P. T. Anderson film as a challenger for that title looms on the horizon.

Can anyone be lukewarm about this film? The stuff people hate--the length, the unremitting emotional abrasion, Aimee Mann singing over the dialogue, the musical number, the frogstorm--that's all the stuff I love. (Well, OK, I could live with a more conventional soundtrack mix.)

Discovery this time is that I can't get away from Deadwood: if I'd given it any thought going in, I might have remembered that Ricky Jay is in it (though I never would have remembered that he's the narrator as well as appearing in the flesh). But who knew that Jim Beaver was Smiling Peanut Patron #1--or even that there were three smiling peanut patrons?

A fistful of ticket stubs

This is the first of however many posts of it takes me to dispose of all the ticket stubs I've accumulated over . . . what? . . . the past year? the past 18 months? Whatever: to the extent I can curb my blabbery, these will be quick and dirty mini-micro reviews.
  • Bee Movie (11/3/07, P14)--Some fine moments, but mostly routine (except, of course, for the implication of not only interspecies, not only intergenus, but interfamily sex, for which I'm searching in vain for some sort of honey pun).
  • Lars and the Real Girl (10/28/07, Crit)--Surprisingly sweet--not at all what you associate w/ the phrase inflatable doll w/ French and Greek features.
  • The King of Kong (9/16/07, Crit)--Full disclosure: my ticket stub read only "The King of," and I had no idea what this was, so searched that phrase on IMDb, finally finding it at position 270. An OK film about souls perhaps even more pathetic than those who blog movie reviews.
  • Steal a Pen for Me (11/24/07, Quad)--A perfectly worthwhile movie, but much like the hundred other Holocaust survivor films we've seen.
  • Wristcutters: A Love Story (11/24/07, Quad)--Oh, my, what a mindfuck! Most of the world will never see this in a theater, but glom onto it when it breaks in DVD: basically, it's The Wizard of Oz with a Repo Man sensibility. A top 10 candidate.
  • Control (11/24/07, VE)--See Steal a Pen comment just above, but for "Holocaust survivor" read "self-destructive rock dudes." The revelation here was that the Village East multiplex has preserved what presumably is what used to be its lone theater: a gorgeous, Egyptian-themed, double-balconied movie palace. I had been here probably at least a dozen times without realizing they had any screens that weren't in chop-boxes, and my ex, who lives in Brooklyn and goes to a lot more movies at VE than I do, was equally ignorant of the place. The explanation, I assume, is that since VE shows a mix of arthouse and blockbuster stuff, the big auditorium is usually reserved for the blockbuster; why they were screening this distinctly arthouse flick there that day is beyond me--but I'm damned glad they were.
  • Who Is Norman Lloyd? (11/24/07, FF)--A beautiful little picture about an amazing if fairly obscure actor (hint: he was the Dr. Auschlander in St. Elsewhere, and in In Her Shoes [aka the most underrated film of 2005] he was the blind guy who makes Maggie read poetry to him) and blacklist survivor.
  • "Crin-Blanc (White Mane)" (1953) and "Le Ballon rouge (The Red Balloon)" (1956) (11/24/07, FF)--Had never seen either of these: beautiful, but everyone but me already knew that. (Must say I was surprised, though not in a bad way, by the roughness, even violence, of the first film--and [SPOILER ALERT!!!]by its suicide-pact conclusion.) Superalert readers will have noticed that I saw the past five films (well, six films, five programs) in a single day in Manhattan. Some other time we'll discuss the M5. But now it's time for dinner . . . and a movie!


01 January 2008

We saw the sea

Follow the Fleet

(1936)

An odd choice for my First Film of the New Year, but it was the only one I hadn't watched since getting the complete Fred & Ginger. Pretty much as I remembered: an even flimsier plot than usual, a disastrously bad romantic subplot between square-jawed Randolph Scott and Harriet Hilliard, but excellent Irving Berlin songs (except for Hilliard's two) and some of the duo's best dance numbers, including my nominees for best comic number ("All My Eggs in One Basket") and most erotic dance ("Let's Face the Music and Dance"). For '50s TV buffs, the film is notable for showcasing two iconic housewives from the era: Hilliard, later Nelson, as in Ozzie and Harriet, and a very blond Lucille Ball (as in . . . oh, if you don't already know . . . ). The short packaged with the film is excellent, a Cotton Club-esque revue, which is, unfortunately, only one reel rather than the typical two-reeler (which is typically lame). The cartoon, though, is not as good as most in the set.

30 December 2007

I'll take Manhattan

Who, when, how long?
Ethan Hawke, 2000, 1¾ hrs.

What sort of Hamlet?
Stocking-capped.

What's missing?
Oh, rather ask what survives--it's half the time of what a full performance would require, so half the lines are gone, and while they're not precisely the half I'd choose, the slashes are intelligently chosen.

What's changed?
In terms of lines as lines, scarcely anything, though the odd direct address is tossed.

What's odd?
Oh, everything, magnificently . . .
  • The setting is Manhattan, and the kingdom is Denmark, Inc.

  • "I have of late . . . " opens the film: Hamlet on video by Hamlet, viewed on computer. Much of the film is on video, captured by Hamlet or by Ophelia.

  • Fortinbras's challenge is financial, displayed on a USA Today front page, with Claudius tearing the page in half--"So much for him"--to signify his disdain.

  • Marcellus becomes Marcella, Horatio's girlfriend, played by the Deadwood-lead-whore-to-be Paula Malcolmson. The unnamed Francisco is a security guard, and the first sight of the Ghost is on a surveillance video; the three come to Hamlet's apartment to apprise him.

  • Polonius sneaks a bankroll into Laertes' pocket during the "borrower/lender" speech, but he doesn't ask Ophelia about her conversation w/ L until a later scene--and at the end of that scene, she does not say, "I shall obey, my lord."

  • Between those two scenes comes the Hamlet-Ghost interview, which is much more physical than typically, the Ghost touching Ham's face early and embracing him at "remember me."

  • "To be" has a wonderful prelude, with Ham watching a Buddhist monk on TV discussing being and nonbeing.

  • Ham's letter to O is written--with false starts--in a notebook in a coffeeshop, then delivered to her in her apartment darkroom. Then Pol arrives, Ham flees, and Pol retrieves the accidentally dropped page, though he later characterizes it as having been in "her duty and obedience." (When he tells Gert & Claud this, at their indoor swimming pool, O fantasizes/prefigures her drowning in that pool.)

  • As one of at least two "to be" teasers, Hamlet visits Claudius's office, piston in hand--but Claud's not there, so a legitimate reason to delay.

  • Finally "to be" is delivered in a Blockbuster video store, and though I had not to this point been enchanted w/ Hawke's Hamlet--had thought it rather flat--this is as good a delivery of that famous soliloquy as I've seen.

  • Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Steve Zahn) meet Ham at a dance club, and afterward report to Clau & Gert via speakerphone. Then we see Ham, during the "rogue and petty slave" solil., watching a James Dean film (East of Eden?) and something that looks very Buñuel on TV.

  • Poster: The Mouse Trap, a video by Hamlet.

  • Pol straps wire to a tearful Ophelia ahead of the "nunnery" exchange; she brings a '60s-looking box for 45rpm records, containing his remembrances: a bunch of letters and a rubber ducky. He is affectionate in the scene, kissing her and groping--whereupon he finds the wire at "believe none of us." "If you would marry" is seen on tape.

  • The "play" is a surreal pastiche of cliché '50s family happiness. Afterward, Ham gets into a cab and hears Eartha Kitt's buckle-up message--brand new in 2000, I believe.

  • Ham bribes the chauffeur and is driving Claud--but there's no explanation of why he declines to kill him while he's praying.

  • Pol is killed via a gunshot through a mirrored wardrobe door--the "one word more" is from a phone after Ham has dragged the body from Gert's closet. Afterward, R&G accost Ham in a laundromat--Claud joins them and gut-punches Ham at "look for him in the other place yourself."

  • Ham mouth-kisses Claud at "and so my mother."

  • Ham (w/ R&G) leaves for England via American Airlines, seen off (silently) by his mother. The captain of Fortinbras becomes a flight attendant, played by Tim Blake Nelson.

  • O's single mad scene is at the Guggenheim: Laertes arrives; Polaroids become "herbs."

  • Pistol used to kill Polonius handed from Claud to L in a plastic evidence bag, as a fax in arriving from Hamlet, announcing his return.

  • Hor picks up Ham at the airport, takes him to cemetery, where Gravedigger (otherwise silent) is singing "All Along the Watchtower." Ophelia's funeral is already underway. Ham offers L his hand to pull him out of grave. Then to Hor's apartment, where two volumes of Vladimir Mayakovsky's poetry are on display--why, I have no idea, not knowing Mayakovsky. The Ghost and Marcella are there. Ham tells Hor of the intercepted and revised email calling for his death. Then a fax comes, outlining the king's wager on the fencing bout.

  • L snubs Ham's apology.

  • Gert intercepts the poisoned chalice, and clearly knows what's up--and then, so does Ham. Laertes pulls a gun to decide matters.

  • Final Fortinbras speech falls to a TV commentator.

Flesh?

Solid.

Ghost?

Sam Freakin' Shepard, and he's freakin' great--good enough that you don't mind that he appears a couple of extra times.

Gert-Ham eros?

No.

Other characters.

Julia Stiles is an excellent Ophelia, and Bill Murray may well be the best Polonius I've seen. Liev Schrieber is very good as Laertes, Diane Venora (Kline's Ophelia, at age 38) a fine Gertrude, and Kyle MacLachan a good enough Claudius.

This is just a fucking terrific production--thrilling to hear WS's language in a contemporary context and have it still seem so right. I mourn many lost lines and would have done the cutting differently myself--and probably would have made it 3/4 of an hour longer--but that's a quibble. If you didn't know Hamlet at all, it might be a bizarre but still effective film; but if you know the play well, it's a brilliant modernization. Five ear-flap stocking caps.

29 December 2007

To sing, or not to sing

Two things before we get started: first, a funny things happened on the way to Elsinore: with about 40 minutes left and Ophelia waxing mad, the disc hung up and absolutely would not be nudged or even chapter jumped beyond that spot. Now you might think, this being my seventh Hamlet (8th counting the reread) in less than a month, I wouldn't exactly have been on daggers and foils to find out how it ended. But as you'll see below, while I was reasonably certain that everyone would end up mincemeat, I wasn't at all certain what the motives and logistics for the mincemeating would be. And as it turned out, even my assumptions were misguided. Anyway, the date of this post is when I started watching; I finally got and watched the replacement on 1/5/08.

Second, and more important, I must confess to knowing as close to zero about opera as can be known: I watched the production as a drama and can assess it only on that basis. If you want a review from someone who presumably knows opera, here's one; Google will presumably guide you to several others.

Who, when, how long?
Simon Keenlyside, 2004, 3 hrs. (opera by Ambroise Thomas)

What sort of Hamlet?

Baritony.

What's missing, changed?

So much that let's just wrap it all up in . . .

What's odd?

Let us pose a philosophical question: if Ophelia were to fall mad in the woods with no one around to hear her, how many times would she die?

There was a point at which this production had me: I was willing to grant Thomas some latitude in recognition of my own ignorance of the medium: a weird prosthetic high forehead on Gertrude? OK, whatever. Laertes sent to Norway by Claudius, and taking leave not of his sister and father (whose absence at this point seemed likely to be for the duration), but of his sister and her boyfriend, to whom he entrusts her? Well, the lack of any real relationship between Ham and L has always seemed at odds w/ Ham's praise of him and declaration of love for him graveside, so OK, take us that way and show us what you can do. The "very like a whale" exchange played in act II, and with Claud, and not only eschewing the whale but employing just one shape, that of a ship? Well, it misses the point, but it's not a fatal misreading. The Claud-Gert affair, per the Ghost's testimony, explicitly predating the murder of Hamlet Sr., which conspiracy, we learn in act III, also includes Polonius (whose only words come at this point)? A different reading, but it might be made to work.

Then came the play within a play, which is just absolutely terrific: a delightfully bawdy, campy pantomime, with all male actors. When Claud reacts, Hamlet accuses him publicly, but then covers his accusation with his maddest actions yet: he fills a goblet with red wine . . . then keeps pouring, soaking the white table linen with the overflow. He pours more wine over his head, then wraps himself with the "bloody" tablecloth. It's a powerful sequence, immediately before intermission, and I was as willing to applaud as was the audience at that point.

And finally, at the start of act III, "Être ou ne pas être," which I'd begun to think we wouldn't hear. I'm still on board--even when, after Ham doesn't slay the praying Claud, Pol enters to tell the king to cool his jets lest he gives the game away. Ham overhears this, so now knows Pol is as guilty as Claud and Gert (why the Ghost didn't bother to mention that is an open question, but let be), and thus has a motive to kill the old fool. Which is precisely not the point in WS's play, of course. But it's OK, 'cause guess what? . . . HE'S NOT HIDING IN GERTRUDE'S CLOSET WHEN HAMLET COMES CALLING. SO HAMLET DOESN'T KILL HIM, AT THIS POINT, OR EVER!

Now just think about that a minute. If Ham doesn't kill Pol, then why does O go mad? Well, for loss of Ham's love, of course--and indeed, in the closest equivalent to the "nunnery" sequence (except that the convent is O's idea), she has become convinced that Ham, who is in fact only distracted by revenge, having just encountered the Ghost for the first time, no longer loves her, and she has already started to come unhinged. So she's just a shallow little twerp? And if Ham doesn't kill Pol, then what's Laertes' motive for killing Ham? Well, O's shallow little twerpy suicide, of course, for which L sensibly blames her ex-beau. But of course anyone who doesn't know the opera can only guess about this at this point--pretty much the point, you'll recall, when the disc crapped out.

OK, so Gert and Ham, in genuine privacy, yammer on and on and fucking on, and what gets killed dead dead dead, instead of Pol, is all the wonderful momentum established right before intermission. Just before this, Gert has brought in O in her wedding gown and announced that Claud has ordered the nuptial altar readied--but of course O knows by this time that that ain't happening, and after the Gert-Ham closet interview comes O's mad scene, singular and solo.

Still in the wedding dress, and now with a pillow/"baby" strapped to her belly, she sings that Hamlet is her husband: "If he were untrue to me, I'd lose my mind." Duh. Now, I have no objection to her having only one mad scene--if I were staging the play, I might merge the two myself. But I feel very strongly about one thing: no matter how many mad scenes she has, she should be limited to ONE SINGLE SUICIDE. But no, in fact, after singing about the "fiery-eyed wili," a water nymph whose job it is to lure poor swimmers to death, she produces a dagger and answers the gnawing question "what are those noncleavagy protrusions from each side of her bra?" (OK, OK: cheap shot: you wouldn't see 'em from a theater seat) by stabbing herself once in each breast. Not content w/ that bloodletting, she also opens a vein in each arm (and I confess I hadn't noticed those prosthetics until she'd stabbed them) and finally, after a superhuman effort that--judging by the ovation of precisely two minutes--must have been spectacular, she dies.

But wait! After rocking on her side during the ovation, SHE RISES! "He is here! I seem to hear his voice! I will punish him for being late!" Then she invokes the white wilis again and drowns herself, to an understandably briefer and less enthusiastic ovation.

OK, one more good bit before the absolutely goofy dénouement: the gravedigging is achieved by spading up a couple of long floor times, removing them, and then just as I was thinking "You're not laying anyone in there with those crossbeams in the way," lifting away the beams themselves. Unfortunately, the gravediggers lack their WS counterparts' sense of humor--they are grave men, to borrow from another tragedy. Ham arrives solo, and though he doesn't yet know that O is dead, he sings an apology to her for putting her is such a state that her "grief-stricken soul, cruelly rejected by me," already seeks heaven. So having established that, how surprised can he be when he finds out she is dead?

Now L enters and, without making clear that she's dead, chides Ham for his treatment of O, then gutstabs him just before the funeral cortège arrives. Ham has his dagger out as well, but he can't bring himself to use it--you'll notice that he has killed no one yet, intentionally or accidentally.

OK, so now Ham has a belly wound, which of course until the 20th century was fatal about eleven times out of ten. But when O is laid next to her grave, he has enough energy to steal her body so that they can go away and be dead together. No serious effort is made to stop him--except by the Ghost, whom everyone sees and who reminds Ham that he hasn't done his filial duty yet. So the Ghost--who earlier had manhandled his son--goes behind Claud and grabs him for Ham to stab.

Well, OK, pretty good mincemeat count now--but that's it. The Ghost tells his son, "Live for your people, Hamlet, God has made you king." "My soul lies in the grave," replies the bloody-bellied boy, "and yet I am a king." The people hosanna him with "vive"s, and so, it appears, vive he will.

Flesh?

Too too Shakespearean to survive.

Ghost?

Bare-chested in his ripped shroud, looking a little Klaus Kinski-ish.

Ham-Gert eros?

No.

Other people?

I think I've covered the interesting ones.

In a nutshell: nuts. They've not in the cast, but let's give it one Rosencrantz and one Guildenstern, for a total of two court ciphers.

22 December 2007

It's acting!

Who, when, how long?
Kevin Kline, 1990 (PBS version dir. by Kline, based on Joseph Papp's NYSF production), 3 hrs.

What sort of Hamlet?
Actorly.

What's missing?
Bits and pieces, judiciously pruned. Ghost appears only once in I.1; no Polonius envoy to report on Laertes in France; no scene w/ Claudius, Gertrude, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern--we first see the latter two w/ Ham; there are actual women among the Players, so no joke to "my young lady and mistress" about his voice changing; no "I'll use them according to their deserts"; no dumbshow; no "I will not speak with her" before Ophelia's first mad scene, which begins w/ O's demand for "the beauteous majesty of Denmark"; only one Clown/Gravedigger, and no bit about Alexander's rotted remains being used to stop a bunghole; at swordfight, Laertes accepts Ham's apology without qualification; and they fight w/ foils only, no daggers (and thus no "that's two of his weapons" joke at Osric's expense); no "hoist."

These are all at the margins, and probably none is a unique cut (except perhaps the swordfight dagger and L's officious rebuttal to Ham's apology--about which more anon). But one omission is significant enough it could as well be covered under "What's odd": Hamlet is unarmed.

The production is in modern dress (complete w/ a Danish flag in the lobby and what I assume are more or less accurate Danish military uniforms), so it's natural that a civilian not carry a sword--but it would be equally natural for a royal to carry a ceremonial one. But Ham does not.

Which means that in I.5 "I'll make a ghost of him who lets me" is a hollow threat, and neither he nor the Ghost can ask his comrades to swear their silence by his sword: instead, he simply holds out his hands, and they put theirs on top, like a basketball team about to break from a timeout huddle.

But of course there comes a time when Ham must be carrying a pointy stick to wield rashly. So how do we arm the otherwise unarmed man?

Well, when play-within-the-play assassin Lucianus enters to kill Gonzago, he brandishes a dagger at "thoughts bleak, hands apt," as if weighing other options to "drugs fit," but when he lights upon that option, he disposes of the dagger by impaling the stage with it--whence Ham removes it after everyone has rushed away. Thus he has it when he comes upon the praying Claudius, brandishing it within an inch of the king's ear, and later when he hears a rat behind the arras. An inventive means of putting the weapon in his hands--necessitated by the odd decision to remove it from his hands in the first place.

What's changed?
Most important changes (or colorings) have to do w/ Polonius's children, who seem to share a tacit understanding of the old man's foolishness. As with the other 1990 example, O's heart doesn't quite seem to be in her promise, "I shall obey, my lord"--i.e., break it off w/ Ham; that coincidence may be explained by the feminist resistance of the time. (Oh, failed to mention a small but very interesting omission from that scene: O tells Pol that Ham "hath given countenance to his his speech, my lord/With all the holy vows of heaven"--deleting an important "almost.")

But her brother is the most notable element of this production: a hulking Frankenstein's monster of a Laertes who grows much more of a conscience much earlier in the final scene than WS gave him. As I've mentioned, he accepts Ham's apology, and then, after surrendering the first hit, he has Ham at his mercy after a stumble, but he declines to capitalize, walks away, and yields the second hit unchallenged.

Then after promising Claud to finish it but acknowledging to himself that 'tis almost against his conscience, he begins to put his money where his aside is, going to the rack of foils to exchange his unbated and envenomed blade for a bated, unenvenomed one. But he's interrupted--and perhaps put back on message--by Ham's taunt.

Even then, though, when Ham goes to drink from the poisoned chalice, L stops him--with the blade--then flicks it to cut him. After Ham secures the wicked blade, L (suicidally?) grabs at it and is cut when Ham whips it away.

What else is odd--or, let's say, notable?
  • I.2 opens on Gert & Claud playing tonsil hockey.
  • At "your chaste treasure," O covers L's mouth w/ her hand, a nice sisterly MYOB gesture.
  • Ham swoons backward off platform into his comrades' arms after encountering the Ghost, like a rock star w/ his fans.
  • Kline plays act II barefoot.
  • Ham has R&G lie with him on their backs at "brave o'erhanging firmament."
  • Soliloquies are oddly static.
  • The act III Ham-O encounter is strikingly marked almost as much by tenderness as by anger. The remembrances are letters, which Ham tears up, the pieces reappearing in O's second mad scene as the herbs she distributes. At "you jig" Ham grabs her arms and jerks her around like a marionette; by the end of the scene, she seems already well on her way to madness.
  • Before the play Ham moves the royals' chairs up onto the stage, which forces the Players to act around them, sometimes descending to the floor--an effective device for getting faces pointing toward the camera. In stark contrast to what I saw the night before, Claud's guilt is manifest: he drops a brandy snifter at "the murderer gets the love of Gonzago's wife."
  • In the Gertrude's closet scene she is at first defiant, then long resistant--more in keeping w/ my reading than most portrayals. (Dana Ivey is a striking Gert, by the way, her mouth often turning down in a remarkable simulation of a Greek tragedy mask.)
  • Ham kisses Claud on the mouth at "my mother."

Flesh?

Solid. And O isn't lowered into the grave, so no one jumps in.

Ghost?

Standard Danish Army issue.

Gert-Ham eros?

No.

Other characters?

I've already commented on the interesting ones, but it's worth noting that Hor and Guild and one courtier are played by black actors--notable because I don't believe I've seen an actor of color in any of the five previous versions.

In sum, while I wouldn't call it a bad production, it's certainly the one of the six so far that I'm least likely ever to revisit. I'd never say Kline is a less-skilled actor than Gibson, but of the two 1990 Hamlets, Mel's is by far the more convincing. He seems genuinely unmoored (no Othello pun intended) and capable of committing crazy and destructive and self-destructive acts; Kline's performance never conceals that after he's carried out, he'll hop up, go backstage to wipe off the makeup and change clothes, then go somewhere nice for dinner w/ Phoebe. Three rats behind the arras.